119-sres486
SRES
✓ Complete Data
A resolution condemning the suggestion by President Donald J. Trump that criticism of him is "illegal," reaffirming the fundamental importance of free speech, and declaring that criticism of the President is not only lawful but essential to democracy in the United States.
Introduced:
Nov 6, 2025
Congress.gov:
Bill Statistics
2
Actions
1
Cosponsors
0
Summaries
0
Subjects
1
Text Versions
Yes
Full Text
AI Summary
AI Summary
No AI Summary Available
Click the button above to generate an AI-powered summary of this bill using Claude.
The summary will analyze the bill's key provisions, impact, and implementation details.
Error generating summary
Latest Action
Nov 6, 2025
Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Actions (2)
Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Type: IntroReferral
| Source: Senate
Nov 6, 2025
Introduced in Senate
Type: IntroReferral
| Source: Library of Congress
| Code: 10000
Nov 6, 2025
Cosponsors (1)
(D-NY)
Nov 6, 2025
Nov 6, 2025
Full Bill Text
Length: 4,071 characters
Version: Introduced in Senate
Version Date: Nov 6, 2025
Last Updated: Nov 15, 2025 2:30 AM
[Congressional Bills 119th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 486 Introduced in Senate
(IS) ]
<DOC>
119th CONGRESS
1st Session
S. RES. 486
Condemning the suggestion by President Donald J. Trump that criticism
of him is ``illegal,'' reaffirming the fundamental importance of free
speech, and declaring that criticism of the President is not only
lawful but essential to democracy in the United States.
_______________________________________________________________________
IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES
November 6, 2025
Mr. Markey (for himself and Mr. Schumer) submitted the following
resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary
_______________________________________________________________________
RESOLUTION
Condemning the suggestion by President Donald J. Trump that criticism
of him is ``illegal,'' reaffirming the fundamental importance of free
speech, and declaring that criticism of the President is not only
lawful but essential to democracy in the United States.
Whereas the First Amendment to the Constitution of the United States provides
that ``Congress shall make no law . . . abridging the freedom of speech,
or of the press.'';
Whereas robust public debate and criticism of those who hold public office lie
at the core of democratic governance, which includes the proposition
that the right to speak, publish, and dissent is fundamental to a self-
governing people;
Whereas the institution of the presidency, like all offices of government in the
United States, is subject to public scrutiny, criticism, and
accountability;
Whereas, on November 1, 2025, President Donald J. Trump posted on social media
that commentary by comedian Seth Meyers was ``100% ANTI TRUMP'' and
therefore ``PROBABLY ILLEGAL'';
Whereas President Trump has previously attacked late-night comedians and urged
the Chairman of the Federal Communications Commission to punish
broadcasters that air the comedians' political commentary by revoking
their broadcast licenses;
Whereas Federal Communications Commission Chairman Brendan Carr has demonstrated
a willingness to weaponize the Commission's authority over broadcasters
for political purposes, including, in September 2025, in response to a
monologue delivered by comedian Jimmy Kimmel, by publicly threatening
ABC and its parent company Disney, stating that ``we can do this the
easy way or the hard way,'' in clear reference to the Commission's
regulatory power;
Whereas President Trump's social media post and the repeated actions of the
Trump administration suggest that they view criticism of President Trump
as illegal and subject to regulatory punishment;
Whereas such episodes serve as a reminder that when government officials treat
criticism--especially of themselves--as unlawful, they undermine the
basic premise of free and open political discourse; and
Whereas the right to criticize the president is not only lawfully protected but
politically essential, and the ability of citizens, the press, and
elected representatives to question, challenge, and hold the executive
branch to account is foundational to the health of democracy in the
United States: Now, therefore, be it
Resolved, That the Senate--
(1) condemns any suggestion by President Donald J. Trump or
his administration that criticism of President Trump is illegal
or that governmental power may lawfully be used to punish,
censor, or intimidate dissenting views;
(2) affirms that the First Amendment to the Constitution of
the United States protects the right to criticize public
officials, including the President of the United States, and to
engage in vigorous public debate without fear of governmental
retaliation; and
(3) urges all officials of the Trump administration to
refrain from using regulatory, licensing, investigative, or
enforcement authorities to penalize or suppress speech that
criticizes President Trump or the policies of his
administration.
<all>
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 486 Introduced in Senate
(IS) ]
<DOC>
119th CONGRESS
1st Session
S. RES. 486
Condemning the suggestion by President Donald J. Trump that criticism
of him is ``illegal,'' reaffirming the fundamental importance of free
speech, and declaring that criticism of the President is not only
lawful but essential to democracy in the United States.
_______________________________________________________________________
IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES
November 6, 2025
Mr. Markey (for himself and Mr. Schumer) submitted the following
resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary
_______________________________________________________________________
RESOLUTION
Condemning the suggestion by President Donald J. Trump that criticism
of him is ``illegal,'' reaffirming the fundamental importance of free
speech, and declaring that criticism of the President is not only
lawful but essential to democracy in the United States.
Whereas the First Amendment to the Constitution of the United States provides
that ``Congress shall make no law . . . abridging the freedom of speech,
or of the press.'';
Whereas robust public debate and criticism of those who hold public office lie
at the core of democratic governance, which includes the proposition
that the right to speak, publish, and dissent is fundamental to a self-
governing people;
Whereas the institution of the presidency, like all offices of government in the
United States, is subject to public scrutiny, criticism, and
accountability;
Whereas, on November 1, 2025, President Donald J. Trump posted on social media
that commentary by comedian Seth Meyers was ``100% ANTI TRUMP'' and
therefore ``PROBABLY ILLEGAL'';
Whereas President Trump has previously attacked late-night comedians and urged
the Chairman of the Federal Communications Commission to punish
broadcasters that air the comedians' political commentary by revoking
their broadcast licenses;
Whereas Federal Communications Commission Chairman Brendan Carr has demonstrated
a willingness to weaponize the Commission's authority over broadcasters
for political purposes, including, in September 2025, in response to a
monologue delivered by comedian Jimmy Kimmel, by publicly threatening
ABC and its parent company Disney, stating that ``we can do this the
easy way or the hard way,'' in clear reference to the Commission's
regulatory power;
Whereas President Trump's social media post and the repeated actions of the
Trump administration suggest that they view criticism of President Trump
as illegal and subject to regulatory punishment;
Whereas such episodes serve as a reminder that when government officials treat
criticism--especially of themselves--as unlawful, they undermine the
basic premise of free and open political discourse; and
Whereas the right to criticize the president is not only lawfully protected but
politically essential, and the ability of citizens, the press, and
elected representatives to question, challenge, and hold the executive
branch to account is foundational to the health of democracy in the
United States: Now, therefore, be it
Resolved, That the Senate--
(1) condemns any suggestion by President Donald J. Trump or
his administration that criticism of President Trump is illegal
or that governmental power may lawfully be used to punish,
censor, or intimidate dissenting views;
(2) affirms that the First Amendment to the Constitution of
the United States protects the right to criticize public
officials, including the President of the United States, and to
engage in vigorous public debate without fear of governmental
retaliation; and
(3) urges all officials of the Trump administration to
refrain from using regulatory, licensing, investigative, or
enforcement authorities to penalize or suppress speech that
criticizes President Trump or the policies of his
administration.
<all>