Introduced:
Apr 1, 2025
Policy Area:
International Affairs
Congress.gov:
Bill Statistics
2
Actions
1
Cosponsors
0
Summaries
1
Subjects
1
Text Versions
Yes
Full Text
AI Summary
AI Summary
No AI Summary Available
Click the button above to generate an AI-powered summary of this bill using Claude.
The summary will analyze the bill's key provisions, impact, and implementation details.
Error generating summary
Latest Action
Apr 1, 2025
Referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations. (text: CR S2097-2098)
Actions (2)
Referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations. (text: CR S2097-2098)
Type: IntroReferral
| Source: Senate
Apr 1, 2025
Introduced in Senate
Type: IntroReferral
| Source: Library of Congress
| Code: 10000
Apr 1, 2025
Subjects (1)
International Affairs
(Policy Area)
Cosponsors (1)
(D-DE)
Apr 1, 2025
Apr 1, 2025
Full Bill Text
Length: 3,452 characters
Version: Introduced in Senate
Version Date: Apr 1, 2025
Last Updated: Nov 17, 2025 6:13 AM
[Congressional Bills 119th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 151 Introduced in Senate
(IS) ]
<DOC>
119th CONGRESS
1st Session
S. RES. 151
Expressing the sense of the Senate that the United States should
recognize the 1994 genocide in Rwanda as ``the genocide against the
Tutsi in Rwanda''.
_______________________________________________________________________
IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES
April 1 (legislative day, March 31), 2025
Mr. Rounds (for himself and Mr. Coons) submitted the following
resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations
_______________________________________________________________________
RESOLUTION
Expressing the sense of the Senate that the United States should
recognize the 1994 genocide in Rwanda as ``the genocide against the
Tutsi in Rwanda''.
Whereas, in 2018, the United Nations General Assembly amended the title of the
annual observance of the genocide in Rwanda on April 7 to be the
``International Day of Reflection on the 1994 Genocide against the Tutsi
in Rwanda'';
Whereas United States officials have noted publicly that the genocide in Rwanda
was ``intended to destroy Tutsi'';
Whereas, on April 7, 2023, Secretary of State Blinken stated, ``The U.S. stands
with Rwanda . . . in remembering the Tutsi victims of genocide. We also
mourn the others who were murdered for their opposition to a genocidal
regime.'';
Whereas the United States Integrated Country Strategy for Rwanda (approved March
14, 2022) refers to the ``1994 genocide against the Tutsi ethnic
group'';
Whereas Rwandan officials, in appropriately opposing genocide denial or
revisionism, aptly note that any nomenclature that does not specifically
use the phrase ``genocide against the Tutsi'' is ``ambiguous'' and
conducive to genocide denial or revisionism;
Whereas the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum notes in its public
educational materials on the ``genocide in Rwanda'' that the victims
were ``predominantly Tutsi'' and that the goal of Hutu extremist leaders
was for ``Rwandan Tutsis to be exterminated'';
Whereas the United States-based nongovernmental organization Human Rights Watch,
which played a central role in documenting the genocide in Rwanda and in
supporting international efforts to bring the perpetrators to justice,
found that the ``Tutsi were being targeted for elimination'';
Whereas European diplomats refer to the ``genocide against the Tutsi'' in public
statements;
Whereas, starting in 2022, the Government of the United Kingdom has used the
terminology ``genocide against the Tutsi''; and
Whereas the United States is the only major country in the world to publicly
reject the terminology ``genocide against the Tutsi'': Now, therefore,
be it
Resolved, That it is the sense of the Senate that--
(1) the United States should recognize the 1994 genocide in
Rwanda as ``the genocide against the Tutsi in Rwanda'';
(2) the Secretary of State should publicly affirm that
terminology; and
(3) other types of atrocities occurred alongside the
genocide against the Tutsi, and the history of the genocide
should clearly affirm the other experiences of mass violence
against Rwandans during the same period, including the killings
and other violence experienced by Hutus and the Indigenous Twa
community, perpetrated by Hutu extremist militias.
<all>
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 151 Introduced in Senate
(IS) ]
<DOC>
119th CONGRESS
1st Session
S. RES. 151
Expressing the sense of the Senate that the United States should
recognize the 1994 genocide in Rwanda as ``the genocide against the
Tutsi in Rwanda''.
_______________________________________________________________________
IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES
April 1 (legislative day, March 31), 2025
Mr. Rounds (for himself and Mr. Coons) submitted the following
resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations
_______________________________________________________________________
RESOLUTION
Expressing the sense of the Senate that the United States should
recognize the 1994 genocide in Rwanda as ``the genocide against the
Tutsi in Rwanda''.
Whereas, in 2018, the United Nations General Assembly amended the title of the
annual observance of the genocide in Rwanda on April 7 to be the
``International Day of Reflection on the 1994 Genocide against the Tutsi
in Rwanda'';
Whereas United States officials have noted publicly that the genocide in Rwanda
was ``intended to destroy Tutsi'';
Whereas, on April 7, 2023, Secretary of State Blinken stated, ``The U.S. stands
with Rwanda . . . in remembering the Tutsi victims of genocide. We also
mourn the others who were murdered for their opposition to a genocidal
regime.'';
Whereas the United States Integrated Country Strategy for Rwanda (approved March
14, 2022) refers to the ``1994 genocide against the Tutsi ethnic
group'';
Whereas Rwandan officials, in appropriately opposing genocide denial or
revisionism, aptly note that any nomenclature that does not specifically
use the phrase ``genocide against the Tutsi'' is ``ambiguous'' and
conducive to genocide denial or revisionism;
Whereas the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum notes in its public
educational materials on the ``genocide in Rwanda'' that the victims
were ``predominantly Tutsi'' and that the goal of Hutu extremist leaders
was for ``Rwandan Tutsis to be exterminated'';
Whereas the United States-based nongovernmental organization Human Rights Watch,
which played a central role in documenting the genocide in Rwanda and in
supporting international efforts to bring the perpetrators to justice,
found that the ``Tutsi were being targeted for elimination'';
Whereas European diplomats refer to the ``genocide against the Tutsi'' in public
statements;
Whereas, starting in 2022, the Government of the United Kingdom has used the
terminology ``genocide against the Tutsi''; and
Whereas the United States is the only major country in the world to publicly
reject the terminology ``genocide against the Tutsi'': Now, therefore,
be it
Resolved, That it is the sense of the Senate that--
(1) the United States should recognize the 1994 genocide in
Rwanda as ``the genocide against the Tutsi in Rwanda'';
(2) the Secretary of State should publicly affirm that
terminology; and
(3) other types of atrocities occurred alongside the
genocide against the Tutsi, and the history of the genocide
should clearly affirm the other experiences of mass violence
against Rwandans during the same period, including the killings
and other violence experienced by Hutus and the Indigenous Twa
community, perpetrated by Hutu extremist militias.
<all>