119-sres108

SRES
✓ Complete Data

A resolution affirming the rule of law and the legitimacy of judicial review.

Login to track bills
Introduced:
Mar 5, 2025
Policy Area:
Law

Bill Statistics

2
Actions
20
Cosponsors
0
Summaries
1
Subjects
1
Text Versions
Yes
Full Text

AI Summary

No AI Summary Available

Click the button above to generate an AI-powered summary of this bill using Claude.

The summary will analyze the bill's key provisions, impact, and implementation details.

Latest Action

Mar 5, 2025
Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary. (text: CR S1583)

Actions (2)

Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary. (text: CR S1583)
Type: IntroReferral | Source: Senate
Mar 5, 2025
Introduced in Senate
Type: IntroReferral | Source: Library of Congress | Code: 10000
Mar 5, 2025

Subjects (1)

Law (Policy Area)

Text Versions (1)

Introduced in Senate

Mar 5, 2025

Full Bill Text

Length: 2,624 characters Version: Introduced in Senate Version Date: Mar 5, 2025 Last Updated: Nov 11, 2025 6:14 AM
[Congressional Bills 119th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 108 Introduced in Senate

(IS) ]

<DOC>

119th CONGRESS
1st Session
S. RES. 108

Affirming the rule of law and the legitimacy of judicial review.

_______________________________________________________________________

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

March 5, 2025

Mr. Durbin (for himself, Mr. Coons, Mr. Blumenthal, Mr. Schiff, Mr.
Booker, Ms. Klobuchar, Mr. Whitehouse, Mr. Kim, Mrs. Shaheen, Ms.
Hirono, Ms. Cortez Masto, Mr. Hickenlooper, Mr. Heinrich, Ms.
Duckworth, Mr. Wyden, Mr. Welch, Mr. Kelly, Mr. Padilla, Mr. Schumer,
Mr. Ossoff, and Mr. Warnock) submitted the following resolution; which
was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

RESOLUTION

Affirming the rule of law and the legitimacy of judicial review.

Whereas the Constitution of the United States establishes 3 separate but equal
branches of Government;
Whereas Article III of the Constitution of the United States vests the
``judicial Power of the United States . . . in one supreme Court, and in
such inferior Courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and
establish'';
Whereas the Supreme Court of the United States, in Marbury v. Madison,
established the principle of judicial review, which empowers Federal
courts to hold that a legislative or executive act violates the
Constitution of the United States;
Whereas Vice President Vance and other prominent elected officials have made
remarks suggesting the President or the executive branch may ignore the
constitutional authority of the Federal Judiciary and disregard a
decision of a Federal court; and
Whereas the President or the executive branch ignoring the constitutional
authority of the Federal Judiciary and disregarding a decision of a
Federal court would precipitate a constitutional crisis: Now, therefore,
be it
Resolved, That the Senate affirms that--

(1) Article III of the Constitution of the United States
vests the ``judicial Power of the United States . . . in one
supreme Court, and in such inferior Courts as the Congress may
from time to time ordain and establish'';

(2) as Chief Justice Marshall held in the Supreme Court's
landmark 1803 decision Marbury v. Madison, ``It is emphatically
the province and duty of the judicial department to say what
the law is''; and

(3) the Constitution of the United States and established
precedent require the executive branch to comply with all
Federal court rulings.
<all>