Introduced:
Jan 9, 2025
Policy Area:
Science, Technology, Communications
Congress.gov:
Bill Statistics
2
Actions
0
Cosponsors
1
Summaries
1
Subjects
1
Text Versions
Yes
Full Text
AI Summary
AI Summary
No AI Summary Available
Click the button above to generate an AI-powered summary of this bill using Claude.
The summary will analyze the bill's key provisions, impact, and implementation details.
Error generating summary
Latest Action
Jan 9, 2025
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
Summaries (1)
Introduced in Senate
- Jan 9, 2025
00
<p><b>Curtailing Online Limitations that Lead Unconstitutionally to Democracy's Erosion Act or the COLLUDE Act</b></p> <p>This bill limits federal liability protection, sometimes referred to as Section 230 protection, that generally precludes providers and users of an interactive computer service (e.g., a social media company) from being held legally responsible for content provided by a third party.</p> <p>Specifically, the bill removes the protection if a provider restricts access to or availability of content containing political speech because of a governmental request unless the request serves a legitimate law enforcement or national security purpose.</p> <p>In addition, the bill changes legal procedures for applying the protection. Currently, the protection serves as broad immunity that typically allows the early dismissal of lawsuits, thereby preempting lawsuits and statutes that impose liability for third-party content. This bill makes the protection an affirmative defense, which means the provider or user must prove that the protection applies before the lawsuit may be dismissed.</p>
Actions (2)
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
Type: IntroReferral
| Source: Senate
Jan 9, 2025
Introduced in Senate
Type: IntroReferral
| Source: Library of Congress
| Code: 10000
Jan 9, 2025
Subjects (1)
Science, Technology, Communications
(Policy Area)
Full Bill Text
Length: 4,305 characters
Version: Introduced in Senate
Version Date: Jan 9, 2025
Last Updated: Nov 12, 2025 6:28 AM
[Congressional Bills 119th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 69 Introduced in Senate
(IS) ]
<DOC>
119th CONGRESS
1st Session
S. 69
To amend the Communications Act of 1934 to address governmental
interference in content moderation decisions by providers of
interactive computer services, and for other purposes.
_______________________________________________________________________
IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES
January 9, 2025
Mr. Schmitt introduced the following bill; which was read twice and
referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation
_______________________________________________________________________
A BILL
To amend the Communications Act of 1934 to address governmental
interference in content moderation decisions by providers of
interactive computer services, and for other purposes.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the
United States of America in Congress assembled,
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 69 Introduced in Senate
(IS) ]
<DOC>
119th CONGRESS
1st Session
S. 69
To amend the Communications Act of 1934 to address governmental
interference in content moderation decisions by providers of
interactive computer services, and for other purposes.
_______________________________________________________________________
IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES
January 9, 2025
Mr. Schmitt introduced the following bill; which was read twice and
referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation
_______________________________________________________________________
A BILL
To amend the Communications Act of 1934 to address governmental
interference in content moderation decisions by providers of
interactive computer services, and for other purposes.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1.
This Act may be cited as the ``Curtailing Online Limitations that
Lead Unconstitutionally to Democracy's Erosion Act'' or the ``COLLUDE
Act''.
SEC. 2.
Section 230 of the Communications Act of 1934 (47 U.
amended--
(1) in subsection
(c) --
(A) in paragraph
(1) --
(i) by striking ``No provider'' and
inserting the following:
``
(A) In general.--Subject to subparagraph
(B) , no
provider''; and
(ii) by adding at the end the following:
``
(B) Affirmative defense.--In a criminal or civil
action against a provider or user of an interactive
computer service that treats the provider or user as
the publisher or speaker of any information, the
provider or user shall bear the burden of proving that
the provider or user is not an information content
provider with respect to that information for purposes
of subparagraph
(A) .'';
(B) in paragraph
(2)
(B) , by striking ``paragraph
(1) '' and inserting ``subparagraph
(A) ''; and
(C) by adding at the end the following:
``
(3) Loss of protection in cases of governmental
censorship.--
``
(A) In general.--Except as provided in
subparagraph
(B) , this subsection shall not apply to a
provider of an interactive computer service that
restricts access to or availability of material--
``
(i) in a manner that reasonably appears
to express, promote, limit the visibility of,
or suppress legitimate political speech,
including a discernible viewpoint; and
``
(ii) as a result of a communication
that--
``
(I) is sent to the provider by--
``
(aa) a governmental
entity; or
``
(bb) a non-governmental
entity that is acting at the
request or behest of a
governmental entity; and
``
(II) the applicable entity under
subclause
(I) sends only to the
provider and not to any other entity.
``
(B) Exception.--A communication that is for a
legitimate law enforcement purpose or a national
security purpose shall not be considered to be a
communication that is described in subparagraph
(A)
(ii) .''; and
(2) in subsection
(f) , by adding at the end the following:
``
(5) Legitimate law enforcement
(1) in subsection
(c) --
(A) in paragraph
(1) --
(i) by striking ``No provider'' and
inserting the following:
``
(A) In general.--Subject to subparagraph
(B) , no
provider''; and
(ii) by adding at the end the following:
``
(B) Affirmative defense.--In a criminal or civil
action against a provider or user of an interactive
computer service that treats the provider or user as
the publisher or speaker of any information, the
provider or user shall bear the burden of proving that
the provider or user is not an information content
provider with respect to that information for purposes
of subparagraph
(A) .'';
(B) in paragraph
(2)
(B) , by striking ``paragraph
(1) '' and inserting ``subparagraph
(A) ''; and
(C) by adding at the end the following:
``
(3) Loss of protection in cases of governmental
censorship.--
``
(A) In general.--Except as provided in
subparagraph
(B) , this subsection shall not apply to a
provider of an interactive computer service that
restricts access to or availability of material--
``
(i) in a manner that reasonably appears
to express, promote, limit the visibility of,
or suppress legitimate political speech,
including a discernible viewpoint; and
``
(ii) as a result of a communication
that--
``
(I) is sent to the provider by--
``
(aa) a governmental
entity; or
``
(bb) a non-governmental
entity that is acting at the
request or behest of a
governmental entity; and
``
(II) the applicable entity under
subclause
(I) sends only to the
provider and not to any other entity.
``
(B) Exception.--A communication that is for a
legitimate law enforcement purpose or a national
security purpose shall not be considered to be a
communication that is described in subparagraph
(A)
(ii) .''; and
(2) in subsection
(f) , by adding at the end the following:
``
(5) Legitimate law enforcement
=== purpose ===
-The term
`legitimate law enforcement purpose' means, with respect to a
communication, that the purpose of the communication is so that
a law enforcement agency can, within the lawful authority of
that agency, investigate a criminal offense.
``
(6) National security
=== purpose ===
-The term `national
security purpose' means, with respect to a communication, that
the purpose of the communication relates to--
``
(A) intelligence activities;
``
(B) cryptologic activities that relate to the
national security of the United States;
``
(C) command and control of the Armed Forces;
``
(D) equipment that is an integral part of a
weapon or a weapons system; or
``
(E) the direct fulfillment of a military or
intelligence mission.''.
<all>