in specific and extraordinary circumstances--including invasion,
rebellion, or the inability of regular forces to execute the law--none
of which were present;
Whereas 10 U.S.C.
Introduced:
Jun 25, 2025
Policy Area:
Civil Rights and Liberties, Minority Issues
Congress.gov:
Bill Statistics
5
Actions
75
Cosponsors
0
Summaries
1
Subjects
1
Text Versions
Yes
Full Text
AI Summary
AI Summary
No AI Summary Available
Click the button above to generate an AI-powered summary of this bill using Claude.
The summary will analyze the bill's key provisions, impact, and implementation details.
Error generating summary
Latest Action
Jun 27, 2025
Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR H3021-3022)
Actions (5)
Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR H3021-3022)
Type: IntroReferral
| Source: Library of Congress
| Code: B00100
Jun 27, 2025
Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committee on Armed Services, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Type: IntroReferral
| Source: House floor actions
| Code: H11100
Jun 25, 2025
Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committee on Armed Services, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Type: IntroReferral
| Source: House floor actions
| Code: H11100
Jun 25, 2025
Submitted in House
Type: IntroReferral
| Source: Library of Congress
| Code: H11100
Jun 25, 2025
Submitted in House
Type: IntroReferral
| Source: Library of Congress
| Code: 1025
Jun 25, 2025
Subjects (1)
Civil Rights and Liberties, Minority Issues
(Policy Area)
Cosponsors (20 of 75)
(D-TX)
Jun 25, 2025
Jun 25, 2025
(D-CA)
Jun 25, 2025
Jun 25, 2025
(D-TX)
Jun 25, 2025
Jun 25, 2025
(D-CA)
Jun 25, 2025
Jun 25, 2025
(D-CA)
Jun 25, 2025
Jun 25, 2025
(D-CA)
Jun 25, 2025
Jun 25, 2025
(D-NY)
Jun 25, 2025
Jun 25, 2025
(D-PA)
Jun 25, 2025
Jun 25, 2025
(D-CA)
Jun 25, 2025
Jun 25, 2025
(D-WA)
Jun 25, 2025
Jun 25, 2025
(D-CA)
Jun 25, 2025
Jun 25, 2025
(D-LA)
Jun 25, 2025
Jun 25, 2025
(D-CA)
Jun 25, 2025
Jun 25, 2025
(D-CA)
Jun 25, 2025
Jun 25, 2025
(D-CA)
Jun 25, 2025
Jun 25, 2025
(D-CA)
Jun 25, 2025
Jun 25, 2025
(D-CA)
Jun 25, 2025
Jun 25, 2025
(D-OR)
Jun 25, 2025
Jun 25, 2025
(D-CA)
Jun 25, 2025
Jun 25, 2025
(D-CA)
Jun 25, 2025
Jun 25, 2025
Showing latest 20 cosponsors
Full Bill Text
Length: 6,843 characters
Version: Introduced in House
Version Date: Jun 25, 2025
Last Updated: Nov 12, 2025 6:10 AM
[Congressional Bills 119th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 543 Introduced in House
(IH) ]
<DOC>
119th CONGRESS
1st Session
H. RES. 543
Recognizing the right to peacefully protest and condemning violence and
authoritarian responses to expressions of dissent.
_______________________________________________________________________
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
June 25, 2025
Ms. Barragan (for herself, Mr. Aguilar, Mr. Bera, Ms. Brownley, Ms.
Bynum, Mr. Carbajal, Mr. Carter of Louisiana, Ms. Chu, Mr. Cisneros,
Mr. Correa, Mr. Costa, Ms. Dean of Pennsylvania, Ms. DelBene, Mr.
DeSaulnier, Mr. Doggett, Mr. Espaillat, Ms. Friedman, Mr. Garamendi,
Mr. Garcia of California, Ms. Garcia of Texas, Mr. Gomez, Mrs. Hayes,
Mr. Huffman, Mr. Ivey, Ms. Jacobs, Mr. Johnson of Georgia, Ms.
Kamlager-Dove, Mr. Kennedy of New York, Mr. Khanna, Mr. Landsman, Mr.
Larsen of Washington, Mr. Latimer, Ms. Leger Fernandez, Mr. Levin, Mr.
Liccardo, Mr. Lieu, Ms. Lofgren, Ms. Matsui, Ms. McCollum, Mr. Min, Mr.
Morelle, Mr. Mullin, Mr. Panetta, Ms. Pelosi, Mr. Peters, Ms.
Pettersen, Ms. Rivas, Mr. Ruiz, Ms. Salinas, Ms. Sanchez, Mr. Sherman,
Ms. Simon, Mr. Swalwell, Mr. Takano, Mr. Thanedar, Mr. Thompson of
California, Mrs. Torres of California, Mr. Tran, Mr. Vargas, Ms.
Waters, Mr. Whitesides, Mr. Gray, and Ms. Ross) submitted the following
resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and
in addition to the Committee on Armed Services, for a period to be
subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration
of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee
concerned
_______________________________________________________________________
RESOLUTION
Recognizing the right to peacefully protest and condemning violence and
authoritarian responses to expressions of dissent.
Whereas U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement
(ICE) agents recently carried
out immigration enforcement raids in Southern California;
Whereas prioritizing the removal of individuals who pose a clear threat to
public safety, such as those convicted of violent crimes, is essential
to maintaining trust and justice in the immigration system;
Whereas ICE has conducted raids by deploying unmarked Federal agents to detain
individuals on the streets, at their homes, and at places of employment;
Whereas many citizens objected to the ICE raids and peacefully protested ICE
activity, primarily in an approximately 10-block area of downtown Los
Angeles, California;
Whereas the First Amendment of the Constitution of the United States protects
``the right of the people peaceably to assemble'';
Whereas peaceful protest is a cornerstone of American democracy and an essential
means for individuals to express dissent, demand change, and advocate
for justice;
Whereas troublemakers also infiltrated these peaceful demonstrations and
committed unlawful acts of violence, vandalism, looting, and destruction
of property;
Whereas these unlawful acts harm small businesses;
Whereas such acts of violence undermine the goals of peaceful protest and
endanger the safety and security of all community members;
Whereas law enforcement and elected officials provided clear assurances that
those who committed violent acts will be arrested and prosecuted;
Whereas local and state law enforcement agencies successfully worked to protect
the public, ensure the safety of peaceful demonstrators, and restore
order in areas impacted by violence;
Whereas the Chief of the Los Angeles Police Department assessed the situation
was ``nowhere near a level'' where the Department would need assistance
from the National Guard;
Whereas public officials have a responsibility to lower the temperature and not
enflame tensions;
Whereas, on June 7, 2025, the President activated 2,000 members of the
California National Guard to Los Angeles and subsequently authorized an
additional 2,000 National Guard personnel to be placed on standby for
potential Federal activation;
Whereas the legal authority the Trump Administration cited for the activation,
10 U.S.C.
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 543 Introduced in House
(IH) ]
<DOC>
119th CONGRESS
1st Session
H. RES. 543
Recognizing the right to peacefully protest and condemning violence and
authoritarian responses to expressions of dissent.
_______________________________________________________________________
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
June 25, 2025
Ms. Barragan (for herself, Mr. Aguilar, Mr. Bera, Ms. Brownley, Ms.
Bynum, Mr. Carbajal, Mr. Carter of Louisiana, Ms. Chu, Mr. Cisneros,
Mr. Correa, Mr. Costa, Ms. Dean of Pennsylvania, Ms. DelBene, Mr.
DeSaulnier, Mr. Doggett, Mr. Espaillat, Ms. Friedman, Mr. Garamendi,
Mr. Garcia of California, Ms. Garcia of Texas, Mr. Gomez, Mrs. Hayes,
Mr. Huffman, Mr. Ivey, Ms. Jacobs, Mr. Johnson of Georgia, Ms.
Kamlager-Dove, Mr. Kennedy of New York, Mr. Khanna, Mr. Landsman, Mr.
Larsen of Washington, Mr. Latimer, Ms. Leger Fernandez, Mr. Levin, Mr.
Liccardo, Mr. Lieu, Ms. Lofgren, Ms. Matsui, Ms. McCollum, Mr. Min, Mr.
Morelle, Mr. Mullin, Mr. Panetta, Ms. Pelosi, Mr. Peters, Ms.
Pettersen, Ms. Rivas, Mr. Ruiz, Ms. Salinas, Ms. Sanchez, Mr. Sherman,
Ms. Simon, Mr. Swalwell, Mr. Takano, Mr. Thanedar, Mr. Thompson of
California, Mrs. Torres of California, Mr. Tran, Mr. Vargas, Ms.
Waters, Mr. Whitesides, Mr. Gray, and Ms. Ross) submitted the following
resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and
in addition to the Committee on Armed Services, for a period to be
subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration
of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee
concerned
_______________________________________________________________________
RESOLUTION
Recognizing the right to peacefully protest and condemning violence and
authoritarian responses to expressions of dissent.
Whereas U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement
(ICE) agents recently carried
out immigration enforcement raids in Southern California;
Whereas prioritizing the removal of individuals who pose a clear threat to
public safety, such as those convicted of violent crimes, is essential
to maintaining trust and justice in the immigration system;
Whereas ICE has conducted raids by deploying unmarked Federal agents to detain
individuals on the streets, at their homes, and at places of employment;
Whereas many citizens objected to the ICE raids and peacefully protested ICE
activity, primarily in an approximately 10-block area of downtown Los
Angeles, California;
Whereas the First Amendment of the Constitution of the United States protects
``the right of the people peaceably to assemble'';
Whereas peaceful protest is a cornerstone of American democracy and an essential
means for individuals to express dissent, demand change, and advocate
for justice;
Whereas troublemakers also infiltrated these peaceful demonstrations and
committed unlawful acts of violence, vandalism, looting, and destruction
of property;
Whereas these unlawful acts harm small businesses;
Whereas such acts of violence undermine the goals of peaceful protest and
endanger the safety and security of all community members;
Whereas law enforcement and elected officials provided clear assurances that
those who committed violent acts will be arrested and prosecuted;
Whereas local and state law enforcement agencies successfully worked to protect
the public, ensure the safety of peaceful demonstrators, and restore
order in areas impacted by violence;
Whereas the Chief of the Los Angeles Police Department assessed the situation
was ``nowhere near a level'' where the Department would need assistance
from the National Guard;
Whereas public officials have a responsibility to lower the temperature and not
enflame tensions;
Whereas, on June 7, 2025, the President activated 2,000 members of the
California National Guard to Los Angeles and subsequently authorized an
additional 2,000 National Guard personnel to be placed on standby for
potential Federal activation;
Whereas the legal authority the Trump Administration cited for the activation,
10 U.S.C.
Sec. 12406, permits federalization of the National Guard only
in specific and extraordinary circumstances--including invasion,
rebellion, or the inability of regular forces to execute the law--none
of which were present;
Whereas 10 U.
Sec. 12406 also requires orders to activate the National Guard
be issued through the governor of the affected state;
Whereas the President activated the National Guard without any request from the
Governor of California;
Whereas the activation of the National Guard escalated and inflamed the
situation;
Whereas the President also deployed 700 active-duty Marines to the Los Angeles
area, further escalating the situation;
Whereas the Posse Comitatus Act prohibits the use of active-duty armed forces
for domestic law enforcement except in limited circumstances, none of
which the President invoked;
Whereas the acting Comptroller of the Department of Defense, Bryn MacDonnell,
testified to Congress that the deployment of National Guard members and
Marines to Los Angeles is estimated to cost $134 million over the 60-day
deployment; and
Whereas deploying the National Guard and active-duty military personnel into a
U.
be issued through the governor of the affected state;
Whereas the President activated the National Guard without any request from the
Governor of California;
Whereas the activation of the National Guard escalated and inflamed the
situation;
Whereas the President also deployed 700 active-duty Marines to the Los Angeles
area, further escalating the situation;
Whereas the Posse Comitatus Act prohibits the use of active-duty armed forces
for domestic law enforcement except in limited circumstances, none of
which the President invoked;
Whereas the acting Comptroller of the Department of Defense, Bryn MacDonnell,
testified to Congress that the deployment of National Guard members and
Marines to Los Angeles is estimated to cost $134 million over the 60-day
deployment; and
Whereas deploying the National Guard and active-duty military personnel into a
U.S. city without invoking the proper statutory authorities nor
coordinating with state and local government officials is illegal,
irresponsible, a disproportionate response which increases the
likelihood of violence, exacerbates the situation, presents a logistical
challenge to local law enforcement, and threatens the safety of the
public and all law enforcement personnel: Now, therefore, be it
Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
(1) reaffirms its support for the First Amendment right to
peacefully assemble and protest;
(2) supports civil rights and civil liberties, including
the right to due process, for all persons;
(3) condemns instigators who have committed acts of
violence against law enforcement, vandalism, looting, and
destruction of property;
(4) emphasizes that all law enforcement, including
Immigration and Customs Enforcement, has a duty to conduct
their operations with transparency and accountability to the
public;
(5) denounces the inflammatory language of the Trump
Administration that has worsened tensions within U.S.
communities;
(6) reiterates support for the military servicemembers in
the Marines and National Guard while objecting to their current
California deployment; and
(7) commends the law enforcement officers who worked to
protect public safety, enabled peaceful protests, and upheld
the rule of law during these challenging times.
<all>
Whereas the President activated the National Guard without any request from the
Governor of California;
Whereas the activation of the National Guard escalated and inflamed the
situation;
Whereas the President also deployed 700 active-duty Marines to the Los Angeles
area, further escalating the situation;
Whereas the Posse Comitatus Act prohibits the use of active-duty armed forces
for domestic law enforcement except in limited circumstances, none of
which the President invoked;
Whereas the acting Comptroller of the Department of Defense, Bryn MacDonnell,
testified to Congress that the deployment of National Guard members and
Marines to Los Angeles is estimated to cost $134 million over the 60-day
deployment; and
Whereas deploying the National Guard and active-duty military personnel into a
U.S. city without invoking the proper statutory authorities nor
coordinating with state and local government officials is illegal,
irresponsible, a disproportionate response which increases the
likelihood of violence, exacerbates the situation, presents a logistical
challenge to local law enforcement, and threatens the safety of the
public and all law enforcement personnel: Now, therefore, be it
Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
(1) reaffirms its support for the First Amendment right to
peacefully assemble and protest;
(2) supports civil rights and civil liberties, including
the right to due process, for all persons;
(3) condemns instigators who have committed acts of
violence against law enforcement, vandalism, looting, and
destruction of property;
(4) emphasizes that all law enforcement, including
Immigration and Customs Enforcement, has a duty to conduct
their operations with transparency and accountability to the
public;
(5) denounces the inflammatory language of the Trump
Administration that has worsened tensions within U.S.
communities;
(6) reiterates support for the military servicemembers in
the Marines and National Guard while objecting to their current
California deployment; and
(7) commends the law enforcement officers who worked to
protect public safety, enabled peaceful protests, and upheld
the rule of law during these challenging times.
<all>