Introduced:
Mar 6, 2025
Policy Area:
International Affairs
Congress.gov:
Bill Statistics
2
Actions
1
Cosponsors
0
Summaries
1
Subjects
1
Text Versions
Yes
Full Text
AI Summary
AI Summary
No AI Summary Available
Click the button above to generate an AI-powered summary of this bill using Claude.
The summary will analyze the bill's key provisions, impact, and implementation details.
Error generating summary
Latest Action
Mar 6, 2025
Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.
Actions (2)
Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.
Type: IntroReferral
| Source: House floor actions
| Code: H11100
Mar 6, 2025
Submitted in House
Type: IntroReferral
| Source: Library of Congress
| Code: 1025
Mar 6, 2025
Subjects (1)
International Affairs
(Policy Area)
Cosponsors (1)
(R-TX)
Mar 11, 2025
Mar 11, 2025
Full Bill Text
Length: 6,474 characters
Version: Introduced in House
Version Date: Mar 6, 2025
Last Updated: Nov 15, 2025 6:23 AM
[Congressional Bills 119th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 199 Introduced in House
(IH) ]
<DOC>
119th CONGRESS
1st Session
H. RES. 199
Condemning woke foreign aid programs.
_______________________________________________________________________
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
March 6, 2025
Mr. Burchett submitted the following resolution; which was referred to
the Committee on Foreign Affairs
_______________________________________________________________________
RESOLUTION
Condemning woke foreign aid programs.
Whereas the United States spent $2,000,000 on a transgender health grant in
Guatemala, awarded in 2024 to Asociacion Lambda for ``gender-affirming
health care'', plus economic empowerment and advocacy for trans-led
groups, with $350,000 disbursed so far;
Whereas the United States spent $20,000,000 on Iraqi Sesame Street, entitled
``Ahlan Simsim'', funded to support educational programming for children
in Iraq, with disbursements ongoing;
Whereas the United States spent $1,500,000 on diversity, equity, and inclusion
workplace programs in Serbia, a United States Agency for International
Development
(USAID) grant from 2023 to 2024 to Grupa Izadji to push
diversity, equity, and inclusion in workplaces, aiming to boost LGBTQI+
economic engagement, with about $1,140,000 paid out so far;
Whereas the United States spent $45,000,000 on diversity, equity, and inclusion
scholarships in Burma, funded to provide diversity, equity, and
inclusion-focused educational opportunities, with details on
disbursements unavailable at this time;
Whereas the United States spent $10,000,000 on male circumcision in Mozambique;
Whereas the United States spent $250,000 on gender equality workshops in
Morocco, through a 2023 Department of State grant to Association
Marocaine pour les Droits des Femmes for workshops promoting gender
equality and women's entrepreneurship;
Whereas the United States spent $100,000 on a drag HIV awareness campaign in
South Africa;
Whereas the United States spent $85,000 on a bee conservation musical in Brazil,
funded in 2023 to raise awareness about bee conservation through a
musical performance in Sao Paulo;
Whereas the United States spent $70,000 on an Irish diversity, equity, and
inclusion musical, funded a ``live musical event'' in Ireland in 2022 to
promote United States-Ireland shared values of diversity, equity,
inclusion, and accessibility, not a full musical, but a concert-style
gig at the United States Embassy;
Whereas the United States spent $60,000 on indigenous diversity, equity, and
inclusion training in Bolivia, through a 2023 USAID grant for diversity
and inclusion workshops for indigenous leaders in La Paz;
Whereas the United States spent $50,000 on vegan cooking classes in Kenya, and
USAID funded this 2023 program to teach plant-based cooking in Nairobi
to promote sustainability;
Whereas the United States spent $40,000 on a feminist podcast series in Chile,
funded in 2022 by the Department of State for a podcast on feminist
issues in Santiago;
Whereas the United States spent $32,000 on a transgender comic book in Peru,
through Department of State funding in 2021 to Peru's Education
Department via Fulbright for ``The Power of Education'', a comic
featuring an LGBTQ+ hero tackling social and mental health issues;
Whereas the United States spent $30,000 on a trans youth art exhibit in Vietnam,
through a 2022 Department of State grant for an art exhibit by
transgender youth in Ho Chi Minh City;
Whereas the United States spent $25,000 on a transgender opera in Colombia,
through a Department of State grant in 2022 to Universidad de los Andes
in Bogota for ``As One'', an opera about a transgender woman's coming-
of-age story, framed as public diplomacy (total project $47,020 with
non-Federal funds);
Whereas the United States spent $25,000 on a transgender fashion show in
Thailand, through a 2024 grant for a fashion show featuring transgender
designers in Bangkok;
Whereas the United States spent $20,000 on drag queen training in Pakistan,
funded in 2022 by the Department of State to train drag performers in
Pakistan as part of a cultural exchange program;
Whereas the United States spent $15,000 on a queer film festival in Ecuador,
through a 2024 grant to fund an LGBTQ+ film festival in Quito, Ecuador,
for ``public diplomacy''; and
Whereas the United States spent $10,000 on a queer poetry slam in India, through
a 2024 grant for a poetry event in New Delhi celebrating queer voices:
Now, therefore, be it
Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
(1) is firmly opposed to funding these programs and
programs like these, viewing them as wasteful expenditures of
taxpayer dollars on frivolous or ideologically driven
initiatives;
(2) requests more oversight of Federal aid programs,
including a comprehensive audit by the Government
Accountability Office of all grants awarded by the Department
of State and United States Agency for International Development
since 2021;
(3) urges the immediate suspension of similar discretionary
grants pending a review of their alignment with core national
interests and fiscal responsibility;
(4) demands transparency by mandating public disclosure of
all grant applications, justifications, and outcomes on a
searchable online database not later than 90 days after the
date on which such a grant is awarded;
(5) recommends redirecting funds from such programs to
domestic priorities, including infrastructure repair, veteran
health care, or disaster relief efforts;
(6) encourages the inspector general of each relevant
agency to conduct annual reviews of grant efficacy, with
findings reported to Congress and made available to the public;
(7) proposes a cap on annual spending for cultural exchange
and advocacy grants abroad, limiting such expenditures to no
more than 0.1 percent of the Federal discretionary budget;
(8) insists on a requirement that all future grants over
$10,000 receive explicit congressional approval via a
streamlined review process; and
(9) expresses its intent to draft legislation prohibiting
the use of Federal funds for overseas programs promoting niche
social agendas absent a clear and direct benefit to United
States national security or economic interests.
<all>
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 199 Introduced in House
(IH) ]
<DOC>
119th CONGRESS
1st Session
H. RES. 199
Condemning woke foreign aid programs.
_______________________________________________________________________
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
March 6, 2025
Mr. Burchett submitted the following resolution; which was referred to
the Committee on Foreign Affairs
_______________________________________________________________________
RESOLUTION
Condemning woke foreign aid programs.
Whereas the United States spent $2,000,000 on a transgender health grant in
Guatemala, awarded in 2024 to Asociacion Lambda for ``gender-affirming
health care'', plus economic empowerment and advocacy for trans-led
groups, with $350,000 disbursed so far;
Whereas the United States spent $20,000,000 on Iraqi Sesame Street, entitled
``Ahlan Simsim'', funded to support educational programming for children
in Iraq, with disbursements ongoing;
Whereas the United States spent $1,500,000 on diversity, equity, and inclusion
workplace programs in Serbia, a United States Agency for International
Development
(USAID) grant from 2023 to 2024 to Grupa Izadji to push
diversity, equity, and inclusion in workplaces, aiming to boost LGBTQI+
economic engagement, with about $1,140,000 paid out so far;
Whereas the United States spent $45,000,000 on diversity, equity, and inclusion
scholarships in Burma, funded to provide diversity, equity, and
inclusion-focused educational opportunities, with details on
disbursements unavailable at this time;
Whereas the United States spent $10,000,000 on male circumcision in Mozambique;
Whereas the United States spent $250,000 on gender equality workshops in
Morocco, through a 2023 Department of State grant to Association
Marocaine pour les Droits des Femmes for workshops promoting gender
equality and women's entrepreneurship;
Whereas the United States spent $100,000 on a drag HIV awareness campaign in
South Africa;
Whereas the United States spent $85,000 on a bee conservation musical in Brazil,
funded in 2023 to raise awareness about bee conservation through a
musical performance in Sao Paulo;
Whereas the United States spent $70,000 on an Irish diversity, equity, and
inclusion musical, funded a ``live musical event'' in Ireland in 2022 to
promote United States-Ireland shared values of diversity, equity,
inclusion, and accessibility, not a full musical, but a concert-style
gig at the United States Embassy;
Whereas the United States spent $60,000 on indigenous diversity, equity, and
inclusion training in Bolivia, through a 2023 USAID grant for diversity
and inclusion workshops for indigenous leaders in La Paz;
Whereas the United States spent $50,000 on vegan cooking classes in Kenya, and
USAID funded this 2023 program to teach plant-based cooking in Nairobi
to promote sustainability;
Whereas the United States spent $40,000 on a feminist podcast series in Chile,
funded in 2022 by the Department of State for a podcast on feminist
issues in Santiago;
Whereas the United States spent $32,000 on a transgender comic book in Peru,
through Department of State funding in 2021 to Peru's Education
Department via Fulbright for ``The Power of Education'', a comic
featuring an LGBTQ+ hero tackling social and mental health issues;
Whereas the United States spent $30,000 on a trans youth art exhibit in Vietnam,
through a 2022 Department of State grant for an art exhibit by
transgender youth in Ho Chi Minh City;
Whereas the United States spent $25,000 on a transgender opera in Colombia,
through a Department of State grant in 2022 to Universidad de los Andes
in Bogota for ``As One'', an opera about a transgender woman's coming-
of-age story, framed as public diplomacy (total project $47,020 with
non-Federal funds);
Whereas the United States spent $25,000 on a transgender fashion show in
Thailand, through a 2024 grant for a fashion show featuring transgender
designers in Bangkok;
Whereas the United States spent $20,000 on drag queen training in Pakistan,
funded in 2022 by the Department of State to train drag performers in
Pakistan as part of a cultural exchange program;
Whereas the United States spent $15,000 on a queer film festival in Ecuador,
through a 2024 grant to fund an LGBTQ+ film festival in Quito, Ecuador,
for ``public diplomacy''; and
Whereas the United States spent $10,000 on a queer poetry slam in India, through
a 2024 grant for a poetry event in New Delhi celebrating queer voices:
Now, therefore, be it
Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
(1) is firmly opposed to funding these programs and
programs like these, viewing them as wasteful expenditures of
taxpayer dollars on frivolous or ideologically driven
initiatives;
(2) requests more oversight of Federal aid programs,
including a comprehensive audit by the Government
Accountability Office of all grants awarded by the Department
of State and United States Agency for International Development
since 2021;
(3) urges the immediate suspension of similar discretionary
grants pending a review of their alignment with core national
interests and fiscal responsibility;
(4) demands transparency by mandating public disclosure of
all grant applications, justifications, and outcomes on a
searchable online database not later than 90 days after the
date on which such a grant is awarded;
(5) recommends redirecting funds from such programs to
domestic priorities, including infrastructure repair, veteran
health care, or disaster relief efforts;
(6) encourages the inspector general of each relevant
agency to conduct annual reviews of grant efficacy, with
findings reported to Congress and made available to the public;
(7) proposes a cap on annual spending for cultural exchange
and advocacy grants abroad, limiting such expenditures to no
more than 0.1 percent of the Federal discretionary budget;
(8) insists on a requirement that all future grants over
$10,000 receive explicit congressional approval via a
streamlined review process; and
(9) expresses its intent to draft legislation prohibiting
the use of Federal funds for overseas programs promoting niche
social agendas absent a clear and direct benefit to United
States national security or economic interests.
<all>