Introduced:
Sep 30, 2025
Congress.gov:
Bill Statistics
3
Actions
44
Cosponsors
0
Summaries
0
Subjects
1
Text Versions
Yes
Full Text
AI Summary
AI Summary
No AI Summary Available
Click the button above to generate an AI-powered summary of this bill using Claude.
The summary will analyze the bill's key provisions, impact, and implementation details.
Error generating summary
Latest Action
Sep 30, 2025
Referred to the House Committee on Education and Workforce.
Actions (3)
Referred to the House Committee on Education and Workforce.
Type: IntroReferral
| Source: House floor actions
| Code: H11100
Sep 30, 2025
Introduced in House
Type: IntroReferral
| Source: Library of Congress
| Code: Intro-H
Sep 30, 2025
Introduced in House
Type: IntroReferral
| Source: Library of Congress
| Code: 1000
Sep 30, 2025
Cosponsors (20 of 44)
(D-PA)
Sep 30, 2025
Sep 30, 2025
(D-MA)
Sep 30, 2025
Sep 30, 2025
(D-PA)
Sep 30, 2025
Sep 30, 2025
(D-CA)
Sep 30, 2025
Sep 30, 2025
(D-IL)
Sep 30, 2025
Sep 30, 2025
(D-IL)
Sep 30, 2025
Sep 30, 2025
(D-WA)
Sep 30, 2025
Sep 30, 2025
(D-GA)
Sep 30, 2025
Sep 30, 2025
(D-CA)
Sep 30, 2025
Sep 30, 2025
(D-NY)
Sep 30, 2025
Sep 30, 2025
(D-GA)
Sep 30, 2025
Sep 30, 2025
(D-CA)
Sep 30, 2025
Sep 30, 2025
(D-IL)
Sep 30, 2025
Sep 30, 2025
(D-FL)
Sep 30, 2025
Sep 30, 2025
(D-LA)
Sep 30, 2025
Sep 30, 2025
(D-CA)
Sep 30, 2025
Sep 30, 2025
(D-IN)
Sep 30, 2025
Sep 30, 2025
(D-NY)
Sep 30, 2025
Sep 30, 2025
(D-CA)
Sep 30, 2025
Sep 30, 2025
(D-CA)
Sep 30, 2025
Sep 30, 2025
Showing latest 20 cosponsors
Full Bill Text
Length: 7,196 characters
Version: Introduced in House
Version Date: Sep 30, 2025
Last Updated: Nov 15, 2025 6:02 AM
[Congressional Bills 119th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5655 Introduced in House
(IH) ]
<DOC>
119th CONGRESS
1st Session
H. R. 5655
To amend the Richard B. Russell National School Lunch Act to require
mandatory certification for certain students and reduce stigma
associated with unpaid school meal fees, and for other purposes.
_______________________________________________________________________
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
September 30, 2025
Ms. Omar (for herself, Ms. Barragan, Mr. Bishop, Ms. Brownley, Mr.
Carson, Mr. Carter of Louisiana, Mrs. Cherfilus-McCormick, Ms. Clarke
of New York, Mr. Correa, Mr. Davis of Illinois, Mr. DeSaulnier, Mr.
Espaillat, Mr. Evans of Pennsylvania, Mr. Garcia of California, Mr.
Jackson of Illinois, Ms. Jayapal, Mr. Johnson of Georgia, Ms. Kelly of
Illinois, Mr. Khanna, Ms. Lee of Pennsylvania, Mr. McGovern, Ms. Moore
of Wisconsin, Mr. Mullin, Ms. Norton, Ms. Ocasio-Cortez, Mr. Peters,
Ms. Plaskett, Mr. Pocan, Ms. Pressley, Mrs. Ramirez, Ms. Salinas, Ms.
Schakowsky, Ms. Simon, Mr. Smith of Washington, Ms. Stansbury, Mr.
Takano, Ms. Tlaib, Ms. Tokuda, Ms. Velazquez, Mrs. Watson Coleman, and
Ms. Wilson of Florida) introduced the following bill; which was
referred to the Committee on Education and Workforce
_______________________________________________________________________
A BILL
To amend the Richard B. Russell National School Lunch Act to require
mandatory certification for certain students and reduce stigma
associated with unpaid school meal fees, and for other purposes.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the
United States of America in Congress assembled,
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5655 Introduced in House
(IH) ]
<DOC>
119th CONGRESS
1st Session
H. R. 5655
To amend the Richard B. Russell National School Lunch Act to require
mandatory certification for certain students and reduce stigma
associated with unpaid school meal fees, and for other purposes.
_______________________________________________________________________
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
September 30, 2025
Ms. Omar (for herself, Ms. Barragan, Mr. Bishop, Ms. Brownley, Mr.
Carson, Mr. Carter of Louisiana, Mrs. Cherfilus-McCormick, Ms. Clarke
of New York, Mr. Correa, Mr. Davis of Illinois, Mr. DeSaulnier, Mr.
Espaillat, Mr. Evans of Pennsylvania, Mr. Garcia of California, Mr.
Jackson of Illinois, Ms. Jayapal, Mr. Johnson of Georgia, Ms. Kelly of
Illinois, Mr. Khanna, Ms. Lee of Pennsylvania, Mr. McGovern, Ms. Moore
of Wisconsin, Mr. Mullin, Ms. Norton, Ms. Ocasio-Cortez, Mr. Peters,
Ms. Plaskett, Mr. Pocan, Ms. Pressley, Mrs. Ramirez, Ms. Salinas, Ms.
Schakowsky, Ms. Simon, Mr. Smith of Washington, Ms. Stansbury, Mr.
Takano, Ms. Tlaib, Ms. Tokuda, Ms. Velazquez, Mrs. Watson Coleman, and
Ms. Wilson of Florida) introduced the following bill; which was
referred to the Committee on Education and Workforce
_______________________________________________________________________
A BILL
To amend the Richard B. Russell National School Lunch Act to require
mandatory certification for certain students and reduce stigma
associated with unpaid school meal fees, and for other purposes.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1.
This Act may be cited as the ``No Shame at School Act of 2025''.
SEC. 2.
(a) Mandatory Certification.--
Section 9
(b)
(5) of the Richard B.
(b)
(5) of the Richard B.
Russell National School Lunch Act (42 U.S.C. 1758
(b)
(5) ) is amended--
(1) in the heading, by striking ``Discretionary'' and
inserting ``Mandatory'';
(2) by striking ``any local'' and inserting ``a local'';
and
(3) by striking ``may'' and inserting ``shall''.
(b) Retroactive Reimbursement.--
Section 9
(b)
(9)
(C) of the Richard
B.
(b)
(9)
(C) of the Richard
B. Russell National School Lunch Act (42 U.S.C. 1758
(b)
(9)
(C) ) is
amended--
(1) by striking ``Except'' and inserting the following:
``
(i) In general.--Except'';
(2) by redesignating clauses
(i) and
(ii) as subclauses
(I) and
(II) ; and
(3) by adding at the end the following:
``
(ii) Retroactivity.--A local educational
agency shall revise a previously submitted meal
claim to reflect the eligibility approval of a
child for free or reduced price meals for the
period that begins on the first day of the
current school year.
``
(iii) Meal claim defined.--In this
subsection, the term `meal claim' means any
documentation provided by a school food
authority to a State agency in order to receive
reimbursement for the cost of a meal served to
a child by such school food authority.''.
(c) Reducing Stigma Associated With Unpaid School Meal Fees.--
Section 9
(b)
(10) of the Richard B.
(b)
(10) of the Richard B. Russell National School Lunch Act
(42 U.S.C. 1758
(b)
(10) ) is amended to read as follows:
``
(10) Reducing Stigma Associated With Unpaid School Meal Fees.--
``
(A) Overt identification prohibited.--A local educational
agency or school food authority may not, based on the status of
a covered child as a covered child--
``
(i) physically segregate such covered child;
``
(ii) overtly identify such covered child--
``
(I) through the use of special tokens or
tickets; or
``
(II) by an announcement or a published
list of names; or
``
(iii) identify or stigmatize such covered child
by any other means.
``
(B) Eligibility determination by local educational
agency.--For any covered child who is a member of a household
that owes a week or more of unpaid school meal fees, a local
educational agency shall--
``
(i) attempt to directly certify such covered
child for free meals under paragraph
(4) or
(5) ; or
``
(ii) in a case where the local educational agency
is not able to directly certify such covered child
under paragraph
(4) or
(5) , provide to the household of
such covered child--
``
(I) a household application and
applicable descriptive material; and
``
(II) written and oral communications to
encourage submission of the application.
``
(C) Collection of unpaid school meal fees.--In attempting
to collect unpaid school meal fees from a household, a local
educational agency or school food authority may not--
``
(i) except as described in subparagraph
(D) ,
direct any communication regarding unpaid school meal
fees to a covered child who is a member of such
household;
``
(ii) withhold educational opportunities
(including grades and participation in extracurricular
activities or local educational agency programs or
services) from, or otherwise stigmatize, a covered
child due to the status of the covered child as a
covered child; or
``
(iii) use a debt collector (as such term is
defined in
section 803 of the Consumer Credit
Protection Act (15 U.
Protection Act (15 U.S.C. 1692a)).
``
(D) Letters.--A school food authority may require that a
covered child deliver a sealed letter addressed to a parent or
guardian of the covered child that contains a communication
relating to unpaid school meal fees, subject to the condition
that the letter shall not be distributed to the covered child
in a manner that stigmatizes the covered child.
``
(E) Eliminating stigma in meal service.--In providing a
meal to a covered child, a local educational agency or school
food authority may not, based on the status of the covered
child as a covered child, dispose of or take away from the
covered child any food that has already been served to such
covered child.
``
(F) === Definitions. ===
-In this paragraph:
``
(i) Covered child.--The term `covered child'
means a child who--
``
(I) is--
``
(aa) enrolled in a school that
participates in the school lunch
program under this Act or the school
breakfast program under
``
(D) Letters.--A school food authority may require that a
covered child deliver a sealed letter addressed to a parent or
guardian of the covered child that contains a communication
relating to unpaid school meal fees, subject to the condition
that the letter shall not be distributed to the covered child
in a manner that stigmatizes the covered child.
``
(E) Eliminating stigma in meal service.--In providing a
meal to a covered child, a local educational agency or school
food authority may not, based on the status of the covered
child as a covered child, dispose of or take away from the
covered child any food that has already been served to such
covered child.
``
(F) === Definitions. ===
-In this paragraph:
``
(i) Covered child.--The term `covered child'
means a child who--
``
(I) is--
``
(aa) enrolled in a school that
participates in the school lunch
program under this Act or the school
breakfast program under
section 4 of
the Child Nutrition Act of 1966 (42
U.
the Child Nutrition Act of 1966 (42
U.S.C. 1773); and
``
(bb) is a member of a household
that owes unpaid school meal fees; or
``
(II) is eligible for a free or reduced
price lunch under this section.
``
(ii) Unpaid school meal fees.--The term `unpaid
school meal fees' means outstanding fees owed by a
household to a local educational agency for lunches
under this Act or breakfasts under
U.S.C. 1773); and
``
(bb) is a member of a household
that owes unpaid school meal fees; or
``
(II) is eligible for a free or reduced
price lunch under this section.
``
(ii) Unpaid school meal fees.--The term `unpaid
school meal fees' means outstanding fees owed by a
household to a local educational agency for lunches
under this Act or breakfasts under
section 4 of the
Child Nutrition Act of 1966 (42 U.
Child Nutrition Act of 1966 (42 U.S.C. 1773).''.
<all>
<all>