119-hr4912

[Congressional Bills 119th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4912 Introduced in House

    (IH) ]

<DOC>

119th CONGRESS
 1st Session
 H. R. 4912

 To amend the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 to provide for the 
treatment of payments for child care and other personal use services as 
 an authorized campaign expenditure, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

 IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

 August 5, 2025

 Ms. Williams of Georgia (for herself, Ms. Ansari, Ms. Brown, Mr. 
Carson, Mrs. Cherfilus-McCormick, Ms. Clarke of New York, Ms. Crockett, 
 Mr. Deluzio, Mr. Evans of Pennsylvania, Mr. Fields, Mr. Figures, Mr. 
 Garcia of Illinois, Mr. Green of Texas, Mr. Johnson of Georgia, Ms. 
Kamlager-Dove, Mr. Krishnamoorthi, Ms. Lee of Pennsylvania, Mr. Lynch, 
 Ms. McClellan, Mrs. McIver, Mr. Mfume, Mr. Mullin, Ms. Norton, Mrs. 
Ramirez, Ms. Schakowsky, Mr. Scott of Virginia, Ms. Sewell, Ms. Simon, 
Ms. Strickland, Mrs. Sykes, Mr. Thanedar, Mr. Thompson of Mississippi, 
 Ms. Tlaib, and Mr. Tonko) introduced the following bill; which was 
 referred to the Committee on House Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

 A BILL

 To amend the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 to provide for the 
treatment of payments for child care and other personal use services as 
 an authorized campaign expenditure, and for other purposes.

 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE; FINDINGS; PURPOSE.

    (a) Short Title.--This Act may be cited as the ``Help America Run 
Act''.

    (b) 

=== Findings ===
-Congress finds the following:

    (1) Everyday Americans experience barriers to entry before 
 they can consider running for office to serve their 
 communities.

    (2) Current law states that campaign funds cannot be spent 
 on everyday expenses that would exist whether or not a 
 candidate were running for office, like rent and food. While 
 the law seems neutral, its actual effect is to privilege the 
 independently wealthy who want to run, because given the 
 demands of running for office, candidates who must work to pay 
 for child care or to afford health insurance are effectively 
 being left out of the process, even if they have sufficient 
 support to mount a viable campaign.

    (3) Thus current practice favors those prospective 
 candidates who do not need to rely on a regular paycheck to 
 make ends meet. The consequence is that everyday Americans who 
 have firsthand knowledge of the importance of stable child 
 care, a safety net, or great public schools are less likely to 
 get a seat at the table. This governance by the few is 
 antithetical to the democratic experiment, but most 
 importantly, when lawmakers do not share the concerns of 
 everyday Americans, their policies reflect that.

    (4) These circumstances have contributed to a Congress that 
 does not always reflect everyday Americans. The New York Times 
 reported in 2019 that fewer than 5 percent of representatives 
 cite blue-collar or service jobs in their biographies. A 2015 
 survey by the Center for Responsive Politics showed that the 
 median net worth of lawmakers was just over $1 million in 2013, 
 or 18 times the wealth of the typical American household.

    (5) These circumstances have also contributed to a 
 governing body that does not reflect the Nation it serves. For 
 instance, women are 51 percent of the American population. Yet 
 even with a record number of women serving in the One Hundred 
 Eighteenth Congress, the Pew Research Center notes that more 
 than two out of three Members of this Congress are male. The 
 Center for American Women And Politics found that one-third of 
 women legislators surveyed had been actively discouraged from 
 running for office, often by political professionals. This type 
 of discouragement, combined with the burdens of child care that 
 still fall disproportionately on American women, particularly 
 disadvantages working mothers. These barriers may explain why 
 only 12 women in history have given birth while serving in 
 Congress, in spite of the prevalence of working parents in 
 other professions. Yet working mothers and fathers are best 
 positioned to create policy that reflects the lived experience 
 of most Americans.

    (6) Working mothers, those caring for their elderly 
 parents, and young professionals who rely on their jobs for 
 health insurance should have the freedom to run to serve the 
 people of the United States. Their networks and net worth are 
 simply not the best indicators of their strength as prospective 
 public servants. In fact, helping ordinary Americans to run may 
 create better policy for all Americans.
            (c) === Purpose ===
-It is the purpose of this Act to ensure that all 
Americans who are otherwise qualified to serve this Nation are able to 
run for office, regardless of their economic status. By expanding 
permissible uses of campaign funds and providing modest assurance that 
testing a run for office will not cost one's livelihood, the Help 
America Run Act will facilitate the candidacy of representatives who 
more accurately reflect the experiences, challenges, and ideals of 
everyday Americans.

SEC. 2. TREATMENT OF PAYMENTS FOR CHILD CARE AND OTHER PERSONAL USE 
 SERVICES AS AUTHORIZED CAMPAIGN EXPENDITURE.

    (a) Personal Use Services as Authorized Campaign Expenditure.--

Section 313 of the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 (52 U.S.C. 
30114) is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:
 ``
            (d) Treatment of Payments for Child Care and Other Personal Use 
Services as Authorized Campaign Expenditure.--
 ``

    (1) Authorized expenditures.--For purposes of subsection

    (a) , the payment by an authorized committee of a candidate for 
 any of the personal use services described in paragraph

    (2) shall be treated as an authorized expenditure if the services 
 are necessary to enable the participation of the candidate in 
 campaign-connected activities or to enable the candidate to 
 carry out duties as a holder of Federal office.
 ``

    (2) Personal use services described.--
 ``
        (A) Services described.--Except as provided in 
 subparagraph
        (B) , the personal use services described 
 in this paragraph are as follows:
 ``
            (i) Child care services.
 ``
            (ii) Elder care services.
 ``
            (iii) Services similar to the services 
 described in subparagraph
        (A) or subparagraph
        (B) which are provided on behalf of any 
 dependent who is a qualifying relative under 
 

section 152 of the Internal Revenue Code of 
 1986.
 ``
            (iv) Health insurance premiums.
 ``
        (B) Exception for candidates holding federal 
 office.--In the case of a candidate who holds Federal 
 office, the personal use services described in this 
 paragraph do not include health insurance premiums.''.

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall take 
effect on the date of the enactment of this Act.
 <all>