119-hr3502

HR
✓ Complete Data

Wrongful Injunction Accountability Act

Login to track bills
Introduced:
May 19, 2025
Policy Area:
Law

Bill Statistics

3
Actions
2
Cosponsors
0
Summaries
1
Subjects
1
Text Versions
Yes
Full Text

AI Summary

No AI Summary Available

Click the button above to generate an AI-powered summary of this bill using Claude.

The summary will analyze the bill's key provisions, impact, and implementation details.

Latest Action

May 19, 2025
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.

Actions (3)

Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Type: IntroReferral | Source: House floor actions | Code: H11100
May 19, 2025
Introduced in House
Type: IntroReferral | Source: Library of Congress | Code: Intro-H
May 19, 2025
Introduced in House
Type: IntroReferral | Source: Library of Congress | Code: 1000
May 19, 2025

Subjects (1)

Law (Policy Area)

Cosponsors (2)

Text Versions (1)

Introduced in House

May 19, 2025

Full Bill Text

Length: 1,521 characters Version: Introduced in House Version Date: May 19, 2025 Last Updated: Nov 14, 2025 6:20 AM
[Congressional Bills 119th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3502 Introduced in House

(IH) ]

<DOC>

119th CONGRESS
1st Session
H. R. 3502

To ensure recovery of taxpayer costs and damages in restraining actions
wrongfully brought against the United States.

_______________________________________________________________________

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

May 19, 2025

Mr. Schmidt (for himself and Ms. Hageman) introduced the following
bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

A BILL

To ensure recovery of taxpayer costs and damages in restraining actions
wrongfully brought against the United States.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1.

This Act may be cited as the ``Wrongful Injunction Accountability
Act''.
SEC. 2.

If the United States (including an agency, officer or employee of
the United States) is found to have been wrongfully enjoined or
restrained under rule 65 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (28
U.S.C. App.) and the security required under subsection
(c) of such
rule is not ordered by the court or is insufficient to pay the costs
and damages sustained by the United States, then the movant shall be
liable to the United States for the costs and damages sustained.
<all>