Introduced:
May 7, 2025
Policy Area:
Energy
Congress.gov:
Bill Statistics
3
Actions
16
Cosponsors
0
Summaries
1
Subjects
1
Text Versions
Yes
Full Text
AI Summary
AI Summary
No AI Summary Available
Click the button above to generate an AI-powered summary of this bill using Claude.
The summary will analyze the bill's key provisions, impact, and implementation details.
Error generating summary
Latest Action
May 7, 2025
Referred to the House Committee on Natural Resources.
Actions (3)
Referred to the House Committee on Natural Resources.
Type: IntroReferral
| Source: House floor actions
| Code: H11100
May 7, 2025
Introduced in House
Type: IntroReferral
| Source: Library of Congress
| Code: Intro-H
May 7, 2025
Introduced in House
Type: IntroReferral
| Source: Library of Congress
| Code: 1000
May 7, 2025
Subjects (1)
Energy
(Policy Area)
Cosponsors (16)
(R-GA)
May 21, 2025
May 21, 2025
(R-IL)
May 21, 2025
May 21, 2025
(R-AZ)
May 7, 2025
May 7, 2025
(R-VA)
May 7, 2025
May 7, 2025
(R-CO)
May 7, 2025
May 7, 2025
(R-FL)
May 7, 2025
May 7, 2025
(R-MN)
May 7, 2025
May 7, 2025
(R-ND)
May 7, 2025
May 7, 2025
(R-AZ)
May 7, 2025
May 7, 2025
(R-CO)
May 7, 2025
May 7, 2025
(R-NC)
May 7, 2025
May 7, 2025
(R-AL)
May 7, 2025
May 7, 2025
(R-TX)
May 7, 2025
May 7, 2025
(R-TN)
May 7, 2025
May 7, 2025
(R-MN)
May 7, 2025
May 7, 2025
(R-MT)
May 7, 2025
May 7, 2025
Full Bill Text
Length: 3,886 characters
Version: Introduced in House
Version Date: May 7, 2025
Last Updated: Nov 10, 2025 6:15 AM
[Congressional Bills 119th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3231 Introduced in House
(IH) ]
<DOC>
119th CONGRESS
1st Session
H. R. 3231
To amend the Mineral Leasing Act to clarify the effect of a pending
civil action on the processing of an application for a permit to drill,
to require courts to remand lease sale Environmental Impact Statements
to agencies to remedy when necessary, and to establish a term limit for
permits to drill.
_______________________________________________________________________
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
May 7, 2025
Ms. Boebert (for herself, Mr. Hurd of Colorado, Mr. Ogles, Mr. Zinke,
Mr. Donalds, Mr. Nehls, Mr. Stauber, Mr. Biggs of Arizona, Mr. Gosar,
Mr. Crank, Mr. Moore of Alabama, Mr. Harrigan, Ms. Fedorchak, Mr.
Cline, and Mrs. Fischbach) introduced the following bill; which was
referred to the Committee on Natural Resources
_______________________________________________________________________
A BILL
To amend the Mineral Leasing Act to clarify the effect of a pending
civil action on the processing of an application for a permit to drill,
to require courts to remand lease sale Environmental Impact Statements
to agencies to remedy when necessary, and to establish a term limit for
permits to drill.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the
United States of America in Congress assembled,
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3231 Introduced in House
(IH) ]
<DOC>
119th CONGRESS
1st Session
H. R. 3231
To amend the Mineral Leasing Act to clarify the effect of a pending
civil action on the processing of an application for a permit to drill,
to require courts to remand lease sale Environmental Impact Statements
to agencies to remedy when necessary, and to establish a term limit for
permits to drill.
_______________________________________________________________________
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
May 7, 2025
Ms. Boebert (for herself, Mr. Hurd of Colorado, Mr. Ogles, Mr. Zinke,
Mr. Donalds, Mr. Nehls, Mr. Stauber, Mr. Biggs of Arizona, Mr. Gosar,
Mr. Crank, Mr. Moore of Alabama, Mr. Harrigan, Ms. Fedorchak, Mr.
Cline, and Mrs. Fischbach) introduced the following bill; which was
referred to the Committee on Natural Resources
_______________________________________________________________________
A BILL
To amend the Mineral Leasing Act to clarify the effect of a pending
civil action on the processing of an application for a permit to drill,
to require courts to remand lease sale Environmental Impact Statements
to agencies to remedy when necessary, and to establish a term limit for
permits to drill.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1.
This Act may be cited as the ``American Energy Act''.
SEC. 2.
(a) Effect of Pending Civil Actions.--
Section 17
(p) of the Mineral
Leasing Act (30 U.
(p) of the Mineral
Leasing Act (30 U.S.C. 226
(p) ) is amended by adding at the end the
following:
``
(4) Effect of pending civil action on processing
applications for permits to drill.--Pursuant to the
requirements of paragraph
(2) , notwithstanding the existence of
any pending civil actions affecting the application or related
lease, the Secretary shall process an application for a permit
to drill or other authorizations or approvals under a valid
existing lease, unless a United States Federal court vacated
such lease. Nothing in this paragraph shall be construed as
providing authority to a Federal court to vacate a lease.''.
(b) Term of Permit To Drill.--
Section 17 of the Mineral Leasing Act
(30 U.
(30 U.S.C. 226) is further amended by adding at the end the following:
``
(r) Term of Permit To Drill.--A permit to drill issued under this
section after the date of the enactment of this subsection shall be
valid for one four-year term from the date that the permit is approved,
or until the lease regarding which the permit is issued expires,
whichever occurs first.''.
``
(r) Term of Permit To Drill.--A permit to drill issued under this
section after the date of the enactment of this subsection shall be
valid for one four-year term from the date that the permit is approved,
or until the lease regarding which the permit is issued expires,
whichever occurs first.''.
SEC. 3.
(a) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, any oil and gas
lease sale held under
section 17 of the Mineral Leasing Act (30 U.
226) or the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act (43 U.S.C. 1331 et seq.)
shall not be vacated and activities on leases awarded in the sale shall
not be otherwise limited, delayed, or enjoined unless the court
concludes allowing the development of the challenged lease will pose a
risk of an imminent and substantial environmental harm and there is no
other equitable remedy available as a matter of law.
(b) No court, in response to an action brought pursuant to the
National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.), may
enjoin or issue any order preventing the award of leases to a bidder in
a lease sale conducted pursuant to
shall not be vacated and activities on leases awarded in the sale shall
not be otherwise limited, delayed, or enjoined unless the court
concludes allowing the development of the challenged lease will pose a
risk of an imminent and substantial environmental harm and there is no
other equitable remedy available as a matter of law.
(b) No court, in response to an action brought pursuant to the
National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.), may
enjoin or issue any order preventing the award of leases to a bidder in
a lease sale conducted pursuant to
section 17 of the Mineral Leasing
Act (30 U.
Act (30 U.S.C. 226) or the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act (43 U.S.C.
1331 et seq.) if the Department of the Interior has previously opened
bids for such leases or disclosed the high bidder for any tract that
was included in such lease sale.
<all>
1331 et seq.) if the Department of the Interior has previously opened
bids for such leases or disclosed the high bidder for any tract that
was included in such lease sale.
<all>