119-hr2331

HR
✓ Complete Data

Transparency in CFPB Cost-Benefit Analysis Act

Login to track bills
Introduced:
Mar 25, 2025
Policy Area:
Finance and Financial Sector

Bill Statistics

3
Actions
2
Cosponsors
0
Summaries
1
Subjects
1
Text Versions
Yes
Full Text

AI Summary

No AI Summary Available

Click the button above to generate an AI-powered summary of this bill using Claude.

The summary will analyze the bill's key provisions, impact, and implementation details.

Latest Action

Mar 25, 2025
Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.

Actions (3)

Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.
Type: IntroReferral | Source: House floor actions | Code: H11100
Mar 25, 2025
Introduced in House
Type: IntroReferral | Source: Library of Congress | Code: Intro-H
Mar 25, 2025
Introduced in House
Type: IntroReferral | Source: Library of Congress | Code: 1000
Mar 25, 2025

Subjects (1)

Finance and Financial Sector (Policy Area)

Cosponsors (2)

(R-KY)
Mar 25, 2025

Text Versions (1)

Introduced in House

Mar 25, 2025

Full Bill Text

Length: 4,660 characters Version: Introduced in House Version Date: Mar 25, 2025 Last Updated: Nov 15, 2025 6:06 AM
[Congressional Bills 119th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2331 Introduced in House

(IH) ]

<DOC>

119th CONGRESS
1st Session
H. R. 2331

To enhance rulemaking requirements for the Bureau of Consumer Financial
Protection, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

March 25, 2025

Mr. Loudermilk (for himself and Mr. Barr) introduced the following
bill; which was referred to the Committee on Financial Services

_______________________________________________________________________

A BILL

To enhance rulemaking requirements for the Bureau of Consumer Financial
Protection, and for other purposes.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1.

This Act may be cited as the ``Transparency in CFPB Cost-Benefit
Analysis Act''.
SEC. 2.
Section 1022 (b) of the Consumer Financial Protection Act of 2010 (12 U.

(b) of the Consumer Financial Protection Act of 2010
(12 U.S.C. 5512

(b) ) is amended by adding at the end the following:
``

(5) Additional rulemaking requirements.--
``
(A) In general.--Each notice of proposed
rulemaking issued by the Bureau shall be published in
its entirety in the Federal Register and shall
include--
``
(i) a statement of the need for the
proposed regulation;
``
(ii) an examination of why the Bureau
must undertake the proposed regulation and why
the private market, State, local, or tribal
authorities cannot adequately address the
problem;
``
(iii) an examination of whether the
proposed regulation is duplicative,
inconsistent, or incompatible with other
Federal regulations and orders;
``
(iv) if the proposed regulation is found
to be duplicative, inconsistent, or
incompatible with other Federal regulations and
orders, a discussion of--
``
(I) why the proposed regulation
is justified;
``
(II) how the proposed regulation
can coexist with the existing
regulations; and
``
(III) how the Bureau plans to
reduce the regulatory burden associated
with the duplicative, inconsistent, or
incompatible proposed regulation;
``
(v) a quantitative and qualitative
assessment of all anticipated direct and
indirect costs and benefits of the proposed
regulation, including--
``
(I) compliance costs for all
regulated entities, including small
businesses;
``
(II) effects on economic
activity, efficiency, competition and
capital formation;
``
(III) regulatory and
administrative costs of implementation;
and
``
(IV) costs imposed on State,
local and tribal entities;
``
(vi) an identification of reasonable
alternatives to the regulation, including
modification of an existing regulation;
``
(vii) an analysis of the costs and
benefits, both quantitative and qualitative, of
any alternative identified pursuant to clause
(v) ;
``
(viii) if the Bureau determines the
proposed regulation would increase costs for
small businesses, then the Bureau shall consult
the Office of Advocacy within the Small
Business Administration to determine ways to
minimize the effect of direct and indirect
costs imposed on small businesses by the
proposed regulation;
``
(ix) if quantified net benefits of the
proposed action do not outweigh the quantified
net benefits of the alternatives, a
justification of the regulation;
``
(x) if quantified benefits identified
pursuant to clause
(iv) do not outweigh the
quantified costs of the regulation, a
justification of the regulation;
``
(xi) an assessment of how the burden
imposed by the regulation will be distributed;
including whether consumers, or small
businesses will be disproportionately burdened;
and
``
(xii) when feasible, and using
appropriate statistical techniques, a
probability distribution of the relevant
outcomes of the proposed regulation.
``
(B) Assumptions and studies used.--With respect
to the information required to be included under
subparagraph
(A) , the Bureau will include--
``
(i) a discussion of underlying
assumptions used as a basis for such
information; and
``
(ii) a description of any studies or data
used in preparing such information, and whether
such studies were peer-reviewed.''.
<all>